I recommend minor revision

Author: ygpp

August undefined, 2024

WebIf recommending revision, state specific changes you feel need to be made. The author can then reply to each point in turn. Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection … WebJul 13, 2024 · After submitting major revision, I got minor revision with only one comment from editor, while one reviewer accepted it (it was not sent to second reviewer). I …

How to Review Articles Sage Publications Inc

WebMinor revision. Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor amendments to be made. These changes can usually … Web1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of research. 2. Personal biases are elevated above … graphing velocity and acceleration worksheet

Macron signs France pension law despite protests - Yahoo News

WebJan 9, 2024 · Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; … WebAddress all points raised by the editor and reviewers. Describe the major revisions to your manuscript in your response letter followed by point-by-point responses to the comments … WebI recommend you try the meatballs. I will be recommending the meatballs tonight. Both of these examples are correct. However, “I recommend” here means we’re recommending … chirurg comic

Asked to review a manuscript; when to choose "minor" or "major ... - Reddit

Can you help me understand this comment on my review article …

WebAccept with Minor Revision This is for manuscripts with minor issues and you don’t need to see the revision before the manuscript is accepted. The AE will check if all the comments are addressed. Sample reviewer comments: “ This paper proposes a novel approach towards solving the reconstruction problem of motion corrupted fetal MRI. WebPerform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if so, please provide sufficient explanation as to why you believe this to be the case in your response letter). Provide a polite and scientific rebuttal to any points or comments you disagree with. graphing vectors in excelWebMinor revisions and major revisions are the two most common editorial decisions after peer review. A decision of minor revisions means your work will likely not be going back to the original peer reviewers for another round of comments. This is actually a policy for many journals. Do the revisions and resubmit. chirurg colditz

"WebThe first read-through is a skim-read. It will help you form an initial impression of the paper and get a sense of whether your eventual recommendation will be to accept or reject the paper. First Read Considerations Keep a pen and paper handy when skim-reading. " - I recommend minor revision

I recommend minor revision

The Publication Process: The submission process: Revisions

WebRelated to Response times for Exams requiring Sonographer review. Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.. Peer Review … WebJan 8, 2014 · First, if you agree with the reviewer, you should do exactly what the reviewer ask you to do, and mention that you have done it. Then the reviewer should be happy. Second, you can disagree with the reviewer and explain why you disagree. In this case, you only need to explain why you disagree. But you need to explain well why.

Did you know?

WebRecommend Immediate-Reject If you feel the manuscript is 1) out of the scope of TMI, or 2) the quality is too low to meet TMI standards, or 3) the novelty of the work is insignificant, or 4) just “good” instead of “exceptional” or “excellent”, you are encouraged to recommend an immediate reject without pursuing the full review process. WebMinor issues are still important but typically will not affect the overall conclusions of the manuscript. Here are some examples of what would might go in the “minor” category: Missing references (but depending on what is missing, this could also be a major issue) Technical clarifications (e.g., the authors should clarify how a reagent works)

WebMinor revisions - the best you can hope for after the first round of review Major revisions - the decision we received in this case Reject – clearly, the one you want to avoid Editors … WebResponse: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. Depending on the extent of the minor revision, the editor may decide not to send it out for re-review. A major revision often requires more substantive changes prior to being appropriate for publication.

WebIt is very possible to get a minor revision as a first decision, and then major revision as second decision, and finally a rejection. This can be heart-breaking to authors. WebMinor revision. The paper will be ready for publication after light revisions. Please list the revisions you would recommend the author makes. Major revision. The paper needs substantial changes such as expanded data analysis, widening of the literature review, or rewriting sections of the text. Reject. The paper isn’t suitable for ...

WebIn other words, if you receive such a revised manuscript for review, you should make either a recommendation to accept (possibly with a minor revision) or reject with no further …

WebHowever, my supervisor told me several times when submitting papers that there's no such thing as minor revisions anymore and everyone seems to always say major just because they can. 2 of my papers came back as major revisions but it took maybe 2 hours of editing grammer and spelling to fix it. graphing vector valued functions onlineWebNov 21, 2024 · After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ I submitted the revised version, and now, the status is Under Review. What does this mean? And normally how long does this round of review take? Kind regards. Asked on 21 Nov, 2024 Answer Follow this Question graphing vector valued functionsWebOverall, the revision is well organized and clearly presented. In particular, Figure 1 is very nice and helpful to understand the framework. In my opinion this paper is worth to be published in GMD. Response: Thank you very much for your previous comments that helped us improve this manuscript. Minor suggestions: chirurg coesfeldWebNov 27, 2024 · I have submitted my manuscript to one of the peer-reviewed journals of chemistry and the decision was 'recommended for publication subject to minor revision'. I … chirurg castropWebReviewer #I recommended publication; Reviewer #2 suggested 5 or 6 major modifications, any one of which would require essentially the researching and writing of another paper, and 2 or 3 years of ... chirurg coswigWebNov 21, 2024 · I submitted my paper to a Springer journal. After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable … chirurg cuxhavenWebApr 13, 2024 · Accept with minor revisions ... Make the recommended changes and resubmit to the same journal: This option could well be your top choice if you are keen to publish in a particular journal and if the editor has indicated that they will accept your paper if revisions are made. If the editor has issued an outright rejection and does not wish to ... chirurg cartoon